In Cowan and Arsenault's
2008 article, Moving from Monologue to Dialogue to Collaboration: The
Three Layers of Public Diplomacy, it is argued that all three methods of
communication mentioned in the title are necessary in effectively reaching the
people of other nations. With the rise of websites such as Facebook and
Twitter, public diplomacy practitioners are increasingly moving their
initiatives to the social media arena. But does it always work?
Monologue
By definition, social
media is not meant for monologue. The ability to comment and to voice one’s
opinion on a subject is what makes websites likes Twitter and Facebook so
popular and interesting to millions of users. In this way, it is more difficult
to control how a message will be received and understood by an audience that
can be as diverse and spread out as anyone with internet access. This lack of
control can unnerve those who might be more accustomed to “older” forms of
public diplomacy, but I don’t think it needs to, if we approach it with the
right expectations. Public diplomacy initiatives must have a space in social
media, because that is where populations in 2012 are effectively congregating,
but the way that these populations are addressed needs to change to fit the
method of communication.
Dialogue
Social media is used
much more comfortably when managed as a dialogue with the anticipation of a
response. For example, because social media allows others to respond instantly,
it can hold public diplomacy practitioners to higher levels of accountability.
Transparency becomes even more important when there is less control over the
message. However, as is true of any dialogue, it’s not always positive or
productive, but if communicators believe in the entity they represent, it gives
them the greatest ability to connect confidently and honestly with the public.
It’s also important to recognize that in many cases, for every negative remark,
there will also be a supporter waiting to defend and champion your cause.
Collaboration
Perhaps most
interestingly, public diplomacy initiatives have found ways to incorporate
social media into collaborative efforts between nations. In Fall 2007, an
initiative funded by the State Department brought American University students
in the School of International Service in Washington, D.C. into contact with
students studying at the Modern College of Business and Science in Oman and the
University of Bahrain. In this online course co-taught by Prof. Alexandra Parrs
and Prof. Bram Groen, the students were required to work together across
cultures and time zones. The students used facebook, email, and skype to
complete the assigned projects and communicate about their research. While they
certainly encountered challenges related to cross-cultural communication, as
well as a few struggles with the technological aspects of the course, it seemed
to be a good experience that will prepare them well for their future
professional endeavors. The professors agree that this type of partnership is
growing and the students seem to have benefitted from building academic
relationships with those in a vastly different culture. It is their hope that
associations such as this one continue to expand and receive state and
institutional support. (For more on this particular project: http://www.american.edu/sis/imi/imq/upload/GroenParrsIMQFall2010.pdf)
There's actually some interesting research on the ways in which online platforms function as a cross-cultural experience. This will be a big factor (or hindrance) to collaborative PD activities - the not-so-shared norms of communication cultures.
ResponderEliminarBest Gambling Sites in Australia - Aprcasino.com
ResponderEliminarTop Gambling Sites · Big 카지노 먹튀 검증 사이트 Fish Casino · The Gambling Gods Casino · JioBet Casino · Bovada · BetUS · PlayOJO · MyBookie · Spinny.